August 03, 2004

THE KERRY DOCTRINE (UPDATED 8-4-04 12:30AM)

What it REALLY means.

In pictures.

Unpleasant pictures.

Nasty, horrifying, gut-wrenching, extremely graphic, not suitable for viewing anywhere anytime, don't even THINK about looking at these pictures without a cast-iron constitution pictures.

Seriously. Not kidding.

(Hat tip to Owen of Boots & Sabers)


» Welcome to Castle Argghhh! The Home Of One Of Jonah's Military Guys. links with: A little tripping around the blogroll this morning.
» Physics Geek links with: A reminder as September approaches
posted by Harvey on August 3, 2004 at 12:20 AM | Permalink | 4 Liars
Trackbacks to THE KERRY DOCTRINE (UPDATED 8-4-04 12:30AM)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/39496
A little tripping around the blogroll this morning.
Excerpt: SGT Hook, the First Sergeant of a Chinook unit currently serving in Afghanistan, answers your questions. While I doubt this, if I have any readers who labor under the delusion that enlisted soldiers are uneducated, unthinking, brutal drones... well, yo...
Weblog: Welcome to Castle Argghhh! The Home Of One Of Jonah's Military Guys.
Tracked: August 3, 2004 07:08 AM
A reminder as September approaches
Excerpt: I believe that lots of people in this country have blotted out the memory of 9/11. Asshats such as Michael Moore I ignore; they don't factor into the equation because they hate this country. The majority of people, though, are...
Weblog: Physics Geek
Tracked: August 4, 2004 11:16 AM
Comments on THE KERRY DOCTRINE (UPDATED 8-4-04 12:30AM)
Michele exemplified on August 3, 2004 09:27 AM

I really wish they hadn't used those pictures. Or at least you should have forwarned people you they were going to see horrible images and not unpleasant ones. The pain is still palpable and the memories still searing for this survivor who lost all her friends on that day. Two of them were forced to jump out of those windows.

No one should use those images to make a political point, not the left nor the right.

Although I understand his points, I think they would have been better said and more eloquent without the exploitation of images from that horrible day.

Russell Wardlow exemplified on August 3, 2004 02:31 PM

Michele,

I think you have a valid point if you're upset that there should have been more a warning that there would be graphic images.

But I think you're wrong that those images should somehow be off-limits politically. Of course any decent person has a duty to not use them in an otherwise disrespectful or capricious manner, but their gravity and that of the event they depict is vitally important subject matter. The sheer horror of that day is a valid argumentative point. It would be dishonest to pretend otherwise. You could just as easily say that pictures of the Holocaust are off-limits, or that of dead soldiers.

Harvey exemplified on August 4, 2004 12:28 AM

Michele - my apologies. I'll change the warning...

... Done.

Michele exemplified on August 4, 2004 06:09 PM

Thanks Harvey, I really appreciate it!